Little Tree Fuel
Project Dashboard · Private Access
Incorrect password. Try again.
First Peoples Energy x Little Tree Fuel April 15, 2026 Phase 1
Project Dashboard

Hi Mike & Alex!

Project
FPE x LT Fuel
Current Phase
Additive Price Negotiations
April 15, 2026
Milestones 4 / 12
Up Next
Mike & Jon — Agree on PO Price
Project Timeline 3 of 12 steps complete
Fuel Additive Meetings
Step 1
Mike & Alex Confirm JV
Step 2
Fuel Sample Sent
Step 3
TODAY
Mike Negotiate PO
Step 4
PO Signed
Step 5
Sample Test Approved
Step 6
JV Agreement
Step 7
Marketing Brainstorming
Step 8
Marketing Execution
Step 9
Receive Order
Step 10
Begin Sales
Step 11
Client Management
Step 12
Project in One Sentence
Indigenous-market fuel technology venture blending advanced ethanol concentrations using the Dynamo additive to achieve premium octane and mileage gains. Targeting Little Tree Gas Station and Kahnawake blending site as pilot launch.
The Opportunity
Target Launch
Summer 2026
Kahnawake pilot site — first blended tank
Pipeline Network
41 Identified Locations
On-reserve fuel stations across Ontario & Quebec
What Exists Today
Fuel Base TechDynamo Ultra All-in-One S96Confirmed
Blend (Super)75% R87E10 + 25% EthanolConfirmed
Blend (Regular)92.5% R87E10 + 7.5% EthanolConfirmed
93 OctaneTested Oct 2025Confirmed
ASTM PartnerIntertek LaboratoryConfirmed
DistributorWowza Fuel — Jon WierdaConfirmed
Fuel SampleSent to CyberFuelsIn Progress
COAAwaiting lab resultsIn Progress
Purchase OrderDraft with JonIn Progress
JV AgreementLawyer drafting requiredMissing
Carbon CreditsCFR feasibility review neededMissing
Blending FacilityKahnawake site — TBDMissing
Build Sequence
1
Mike & Jon Negotiate PO WE ARE HERE
Mike × Jon
Agree on new additive price and future PO terms. Nothing moves until this is done.
2
PO Signed → Wowza Pays Amspec
Mike + Jon + Tiffanie
PO signature triggers Wowza covering the Amspec lab testing bill.
3
COA Approved + Mileage Proof
Jeff Porter + Amspec
Blend validated. Gasoline mileage gain documented. Credibility established for partners.
4
JV Agreement Drafted
Mike + Alex + Lawyers
Structure the deal once product is validated. Equity, revenue split, territory, governance.
5
Kahnawake Pilot Launch
All Parties
First blended tank sold. POS live. 14-retailer rollout begins via FPE network.
Current Stage
Additive Price Negotiations
Wowza / Jon Wierda. New pricing requires Mike's approval before the PO can be activated.
🔒
Blocked Because
Mike Has Not Approved New PO Price
Conversation with Jon must happen next to negotiate price and set terms going forward.
Recent Updates
🌍
Price Increase
+27%
Due to the war in Iran, the cost of the Dynamo additive has increased 27%. This was communicated to Mike after he had already paid to send the fuel sample to Amspec Labs.
📋
Mileage Proof
Unverified for Gasoline
Tiffanie requested documented proof of mileage gains. Jon submitted some information (see email exchange) but no verified proof exists for gasoline — only diesel. Jon maintains a 15% average increase via email only.
🧪
Testing Commitment
Wowza Pays Amspec — On Condition
Once Mike accepts the new PO price, Wowza commits to covering the Amspec fuel testing costs. PO acceptance is the trigger.
Next Step — Action Required
Mike must call Jon next to negotiate the new additive price and set terms for future POs.
Mike × Jon
Call Prep
Mike × Jon — Additive Price & Proof Call
Two issues to resolve before any PO is signed.
Participants
Mike David · Jon Wierda
Issue 1
Price Increase Timing
Mike committed to and paid for the Amspec shipment under Jan 16 pricing (~$14,370 USD/tote). The 27% increase to $18,250 USD arrived the same day as the provisional PO — a cost Mike never agreed to. The ratio also dropped 1280:1 → 1180:1, compounding the hit.
Issue 2
No Written Proof for Gasoline
Every certified result Jon has is diesel-only (26.72% MPG, 17 trucks). For gasoline, Mike has only Jon's personal Subaru anecdote ("just under 20% on a hilly drive") and a verbal "15% is conservative." Nothing Mike can put in writing to 30+ station owners.
How to Open the Call
"Jon, I want to have a real conversation today — not just about price, but about what needs to be true for me to commit at the scale we've been talking about. I believe in what you've built. I just have two things I need your help resolving before I can move forward."
Don't list grievances. Don't explain at length. Name the two issues and ask him to solve them with you.
Agenda
Item 1 — The Price
Address the Timing Issue Directly
"I authorized the Amspec shipment based on January pricing. The new rate came in the same day as the PO — that's a conversation I didn't get to have before committing those costs." Ask for: Wowza covers Amspec unconditionally, OR price concession that acknowledges good-faith timing.
Item 2 — The Proof
Get the 15% in Writing
"I have 30+ station owners who will ask me for proof. Your Subaru test is not something I can close a deal on. I need a number I can stand behind." Ask for: A signed letter or email confirming minimum 15% fuel economy improvement on the gasoline blend.
Item 3 — The Pipeline
Make the Future Picture Real
Before any ask, paint the scale: 41 stations in pipeline, 30+ closings targeted this summer. "Help me get what I need to sell this, and Wowza is the supplier for the whole network."
Item 4 — Ratio Clarification
Confirm Final Treatment Ratio
Jan pricing had 1280:1. New pricing shows 1180:1 — same tote, ~24,000 fewer gallons of coverage. Ask for: Confirmation of final ratio before any PO is signed. Both changes together make the real cost increase higher than 27%.
Leave the Call With
1
Written gasoline performance letter — minimum 15% fuel economy, signed by Jon
2
Wowza covers Amspec cost — unconditional, not tied to PO acceptance
3
Final confirmed treatment ratio in writing before PO is activated
4
A specific date for Jon's response — not "I'll get back to you"
Mindset Going In
You don't have to walk away. You just have to be genuinely willing to. That's the only leverage that works.
What Would Jay Do?
Mike's Call with Jon — Negotiation Strategy Through Jay Abraham's Lens
"You are not a buyer complaining about price. You are a strategic partner who needs Jon to help you justify moving forward at scale. Make him your ally in solving the problem — not your opponent across a table."

The Real Situation on the Table
Two things happened that Mike must address, and neither one alone is the whole problem. Together they represent a serious trust issue that, if left unaddressed, will poison the partnership before it starts.

Issue 1 — The Timing of the Price Increase. Mike authorized and paid for the Amspec fuel sample shipment based on January pricing of ~$14,370 USD/tote. Jon sent revised "War Pricing" at $18,250 USD/tote on the same day as the provisional PO — a 27% increase Mike never saw coming and couldn't factor into his decision.

Issue 2 — There Is No Written Proof for Gasoline. Every documented result in Jon's possession — the 26.72% MPG diesel study, the 17-truck fleet data — is diesel only. For gasoline, all Mike has is Jon's personal anecdote ("just under 20% on my Subaru on a hilly drive") and a verbal assurance that 15% is "a very conservative number." That is not a number Mike can stake a marketing campaign, a sales pitch to 30+ stations, or a customer promise on.

Three Jay Abraham Principles That Apply Here
01 — Preeminence
Come as the Advisor, Not the Buyer
Don't open with complaints. Open as someone who genuinely wants this to work and needs Jon's help making the numbers defensible. That posture instantly makes Jon your ally.
02 — Risk Reversal
Make Jon Carry the Proof
If the product genuinely delivers 15%+ on gasoline, Jon should have no problem putting it in writing. Jay would say: if you believe in your product, guarantee it. The reluctance to commit is the data point.
03 — The Pipeline Principle
One Tote Is Not the Deal
41 stations. 30+ closings targeted for this summer. If this works, Jon is looking at a recurring annual contract worth hundreds of thousands. That future needs to be front and center in every sentence.

How to Open the Call
Do not open with the price. Open with the relationship and the vision — then introduce the problem as something you need his help to solve.

Say something like:

"Jon, I want to have a real conversation today — not just about price, but about what we need to be true for me to commit to this at the scale we've been talking about. I believe in what you've built. I just have two things I need your help resolving before I can move forward."

That's it. Don't over-explain. Don't list grievances. Just name the two issues and ask him to solve them with you.

Issue 1 — The Price Increase: How to Address It
State the facts plainly and without anger. The power is in the sequence of events, not in the emotion.

Frame it like this:

"Jon, when I authorized the Amspec shipment and the fuel testing, I was working off the January 16 pricing. That was the basis for my decision. The revised pricing came in the same day as the provisional PO — that's a conversation I didn't get to have before committing those costs. I'm not saying it's wrong. I'm saying the timing put me in a position I didn't choose."

Then let him respond. Don't fill the silence. His answer will tell you everything about how he views the partnership.

What you're asking for: Either a price concession that recognizes the good-faith timing issue — OR Wowza absorbs the full Amspec testing cost regardless of PO status, since that cost was incurred under the old pricing assumptions.

Issue 2 — The Proof Gap: How to Address It
This is the bigger strategic issue. Jon has outstanding results for diesel. He has zero certified results for the gasoline + ethanol + Dynamo blend Mike is actually buying. The "15% conservative" number is verbal. Jon's own personal test was informal, on one vehicle, on a hilly drive.

Frame it like this:

"Jon, I need to be straight with you. I have 30+ gas station owners who are going to ask me: what's the proof? Right now, the best answer I have is your personal Subaru test. I can't close a single station on that. I'm not doubting you — I'm just telling you what my sales process looks like. To move this forward at scale, I need something I can stand behind."

What you're asking for: A written letter — even a signed email — confirming that the gasoline-ethanol-Dynamo blend delivers a minimum 15% fuel economy improvement. That single document unlocks Mike's ability to sell. Without it, the product is asking Mike to be the proof.

Always Paint the Future First
Jay Abraham never lets a negotiation stay small. Before Mike makes any ask, he should make Jon feel the full size of what's possible.

"Jon, I want you to understand what's actually at stake here. We have 41 stations in our pipeline right now. We're targeting 30+ closings this summer. If the Amspec results come back clean and the pricing works, I'm not talking about one tote — I'm talking about a recurring contract across an Indigenous fuel network that nobody else has ever built. Help me get the proof I need to go sell this, and I'll make Wowza the supplier for all of it."

Leave the Call With These Four Things
Jay would say a call without specific commitments is just a conversation. End this call with written next steps.
Commitment 1
Written Gasoline Performance Letter
A signed statement confirming minimum 15% fuel economy improvement on the gasoline-ethanol-Dynamo blend. Jon must send this before Mike proceeds.
Commitment 2
Wowza Covers Amspec Cost Unconditionally
Mike incurred the Amspec testing cost under old pricing. Wowza's commitment to cover testing should not be conditional on accepting a price Mike never agreed to.
Commitment 3
Pricing Clarity on the Ratio Change
The treatment ratio dropped from 1280:1 to 1180:1 alongside the 27% price increase — a double hit. Jon must explain and confirm the final ratio before any PO is signed.
Commitment 4
A Concrete Next Step With a Date
Don't end without a specific date for Jon's written response. "I'll get back to you" is not a commitment. "I'll send the letter by Friday" is.

Jay's Question Mike Should Ask Himself Before Dialing
"Am I willing to walk away from this deal if Jon won't put the 15% in writing?"
Why it matters: If the answer is yes, you negotiate from strength and Jon will feel it. If the answer is no, Jon will feel that too — and the price will never come down. You don't have to walk away. You just have to be genuinely willing to. That's the only leverage that works.
Correspondence Thread
Jon · John L. · Tiffanie
Tue, Apr 15 · 12:27 PM
Proven results doc
5
Really appreciate everything that came through yesterday…
⚑ Action Pending — Request for Written 15% Commitment
THREAD
T
Tiffanie Rothwell Tue, Apr 15 · 12:27 PM
Hi Jon, Really appreciate everything that came through yesterday…
From: Tiffanie Rothwell <tiffanie@mjmventures.ai>  ·  To: Jon, Jeff, John  ·  Bcc: Mike

Hi Jon,

Really appreciate everything that came through yesterday. Jon's note and your personal test result were exactly the kind of context that helps us build the case on our end.

As you know, Mike has been building his vision for this project around the fuel economy story. The 20%+ improvement has been central to how he's been thinking about the opportunity, the market positioning, the value proposition to end customers, and frankly the economics that make the whole thing worth doing at scale.

I do want to flag something. Your website references up to 30%, which is exciting, though we've just learned that figure is specific to the diesel formulation. That's actually new information that Mike will need to work through, which is part of why I want to make sure we get a call on the books with him soon.

In the meantime, one thing that would really help us move things forward is having something in writing. You've told us 15% is the conservative number you're comfortable with for gasoline, and your personal test came in just under 20% on a hilly drive. We're not asking for anything that hasn't already been proven. We just need a number we can actually stand behind in our own marketing, something defensible that we can bring to all the 30+ locations we're looking to close this summer.

Is there any way you can provide a letter confirming a minimum 15% fuel economy improvement on the regular gasoline blend? That one piece would go a long way toward helping Mike commit to the volumes we've been discussing and gives us the foundation we need to go out and sell this properly.

Let's find a time to connect the three of us next week. Mike will be in LA time (much easier to coordinate than Bali time).

Looking forward to your next reply.
Thanks Jon :)

J
Jon Wierda Mon, Apr 13 · 7:34 PM
It is for diesel only, yes. Also I used the octane booster in a controlled test…
From: Jon Wierda  ·  To: Tiffanie, Jeff, John

It is for diesel only, yes.

Also I used the octane booster in a controlled test in my 2019 Subaru Ascent and got a little under 20 % increase in mpg. It was a 2 lane hilly drive and the increase in power was noticeable.

Also, Michael Kloepfer (Kahnawake) filled up with Spooky's blended fuel and had great reviews.

T
Tiffanie Rothwell Mon, Apr 13 · 6:23 PM
Hi Jon, This is great - thank you! Is this sheet for Diesel only?
From: Tiffanie Rothwell <tiffanie@mjmventures.ai>  ·  To: Jon, Jeff, John

Hi Jon,

This is great - thank you! Is this sheet for Diesel only?

JL
John Lawrence · CyberFuels Mon, Apr 13 · 5:16 PM
Hi Jon and Tiffanie, I'll let Jeff add more 'chemically substantiated algorithms'…
From: John Lawrence <jlawrence@cyberfuelsinc.com>  ·  To: Jon, Tiffanie, Jeff

Hi Jon and Tiffanie,

I'll let Jeff add more 'chemically substantiated algorithms' to this email discussion, but the Dynamo™ affect has been proven in all of the different formulas that we've created before for:

  • Gasoline
  • Diesel
  • Home heating fuels (replacing the dependency of kerosene)
  • Marine fuels
  • Flex 96

This is another new formula with increased ethanol concentration. Previously, we've had outstanding results with methanol in conjunction with ethanol, so I don't believe that we'll see anything but excellent results again.

We / CyberFuels looks forward to working with you, Mike, and the rest of this new and exciting blending group. The end customers will be just as excited after they've run their automobiles on this greener and cleaner and more efficient fuel. Here to help, let me know how …

John Lawrence · CyberFuels Inc · 617-947-6938

J
Jon Wierda Mon, Apr 13 · 4:32 PM
Tiffanie, we have used this summary sheet on our global discussions…
From: Jon Wierda <jon@wowzafuel.com>  ·  To: Tiffanie, Jeff, John

Tiffanie, we have used this summary sheet on our global discussions.

I have copied both Jeff Porter and John Lawrence from CF on this and they can add along the way.

PDF
Proven results — Dynamo Ultra Pilot Tests
17 trucks · 26.72% avg MPG increase · Diesel verified
OPEN PDF →
Jon Wierda · iMessage
Mon–Tue, Apr 14–15
Text thread — ratio, mileage proof, video
💬 Jon confirmed 1280:1 ratio · 15% conservative number · video sent
TEXT
iMessage · Jon Wierda (LT fuel) ↔ Tiffanie Rothwell
Saturday · Apr 12
J
Good morning. I confirmed with Jeff at CF that the ratio can be 1280 to 1 for the regular blend. I will update my schedules when online later today. Thank you
7:51 AM
Thanks Jon
No need to update the docs, I can do that for you no worries!
7:51 AM ✓✓
Monday · Apr 14
J
Ok. Please keep me posted. Thank you
1:38 PM
Hi Jon,
Did you see my email about the mileage? That's all I'm missing from you and I'll present to Mike
1:39 PM ✓✓
J
I did but not sure what you asked for. The COA of certificate of analysis is something that would come from Alex and his supplier. And the test results are what is being done on the samples. I would use 15 percent as a very conservative number
1:50 PM
Just to confirm - You don't have any proof of the fuel efficiency mileage to prove 15%?
1:50 PM ✓✓
It was mentioned many times in the fireflies transcripts - there must be some proof of that in order to give that conservative 15% number, right?
1:51 PM ✓✓
J
Sent a few emails on the results of using the additives.
6:01 PM
J
Video · 42.2 MB
Dynamo burn time & carbon residue test
Tiffanie, here is a video I did that shows the burn time and carbon residue for the Dynamo additive and a competitor. It is informal but shows the difference from usage in a good way. Enjoy!
9:56 PM
Tuesday · Apr 15
J
I am driving today and will reply to your email tomorrow. Thanks
2:26 PM
📧 Tiffanie's reply was sent via email — see Proven results doc thread (Tue, Apr 15 · 12:27 PM) for the full written response.
Jon Wierda
Mon, Apr 13 · 7:44 PM
Gas price article
🔗 Link
🔗 Market Context — oilprice.com
EMAIL
From: Jon Wierda <jon@wowzafuel.com>  ·  To: Patricia, Carl, Joe, Lance, Tiffanie

All, good evening. The media continues to report on oil prices and the length of the high prices at the pump. Here is the first I have seen where the US administration has weighed in.

So for what it is worth, there is a huge opportunity for the additives to create some immediate relief at the pump while delivering a higher quality product.

Trump Signals High Gas Prices Through November Midterms
oilprice.com
Jon Wierda
Mon, Apr 13 · 5:22 PM
Cyber Fuels link
🔗 Link
🔗 CyberFuels Fuel Additives Page
EMAIL
From: Jon Wierda <jon@wowzafuel.com>  ·  To: Tiffanie
https://www.cyberfuelsinc.com/markets/fuel-additives
Jon · Tiffanie
Fri, Apr 10 · 1:33 PM
PDF with revised pricing
6
📎 3 PDFs I am working with Jeff on determining the flexibility of the ratio…
📎 3 PDFs · Treatment ratio change · Ratio flexibility TBD
THREAD
J
Jon Wierda Fri, Apr 10 · 1:33 PM
I am working with Jeff on determining the flexibility of the ratio so hold off on a final report…
From: Jon Wierda <jon@wowzafuel.com>  ·  To: Jeff, Tiffanie

I am working with Jeff on determining the flexibility of the ratio so hold off on a final report. Where it gets interesting is the starting fuel source. I have always anticipated a R87E10 base fuel as I can estimate that cost. If a CBOB is the base and ethanol is added to that the numbers can change. The actual testing will help finalize all of that which is why we have been asking Alex for that for some time.

There can be a different ratio depending on where we start if that makes sense. I am pushing to get us there.

In the meantime, having the cost that Alex pays for his fuel will be very helpful so I can do apples to apples calulations and we can best compare the economics. We have never received those and have requested them as you are aware.

So...will let you know as soon as I can.

T
Tiffanie Rothwell Fri, Apr 10 · 9:35 AM
Hi Jon, Thanks for confirming. One more thing — the treatment ratio changed from 1280:1 to 1180:1…
From: Tiffanie Rothwell <tiffanie@mjmventures.ai>  ·  To: Jon

Hi Jon,

Thanks for confirming. One more thing I want to make sure I'm reading correctly. In the original pricing sheet, the treatment ratio for regular was 1280:1, meaning one tote treated 316,800 gallons of regular. In the new war pricing sheet, that ratio has changed to 1180:1. If I'm reading that right, the same tote now treats about 24,000 fewer gallons of regular than before. So not only is the tote price up 27%, but it also covers less volume, which means Mike would need to buy more totes annually to treat the same amount of fuel.

Can you help me understand why the treatment ratio changed?
Thanks in advance

J
Jon Wierda Fri, Apr 10 · 9:29 AM
Tiffanie, you are correct on the additive increase. WTI has increased by 63%, Brent Crude 48%…
From: Jon Wierda <jon@wowzafuel.com>  ·  To: Tiffanie

Tiffanie, you are correct on the additive increase.

Also, since the date of the earlier pricing (January 16) WTI has increased by 63%, Brent Crude ny 48%.

I would anticipate an increase in the cost at FPE to increase relatively but only used an increase in cost of 16 percent for regular and about 11 percent for premium grades in my calculations.

Thank you

T
Tiffanie Rothwell Fri, Apr 10 · 8:54 AM
Got it! Just to confirm, that's a 27% increase from the price you sent over on January 16th right?…
From: Tiffanie Rothwell <tiffanie@mjmventures.ai>  ·  To: Jon

Got it! Just to confirm, that's a 27% increase from the price you sent over on January 16th right? Just want to make sure I have those number right before sending my report to Mike.

J
Jon Wierda Fri, Apr 10 · 8:50 AM
This pricing reflects the new additive pricing given the increases in the oil prices…
From: Jon Wierda <jon@wowzafuel.com>  ·  To: Tiffanie

This pricing reflects the new additive pricing given the increases in the oil prices. The tote price used here is $18,250 delivered.

J
Jon Wierda Fri, Apr 10 · 7:36 AM
Tiffanie, attached are the revised schedules. Please review so we can get the provisional PO done…
From: Jon Wierda <jon@wowzafuel.com>  ·  To: Tiffanie

Tiffanie, attached are the revised schedules. I estimated the cost figures as none were provided to me. Please review so we can get the provisional PO done ahead of the testing. Thank you

PDF
Gas Ethanol Blend War Pricing — Assumptions
Cost estimate basis & assumptions
OPEN PDF →
PDF
Gas Ethanol Blend War Pricing — Regular
Regular grade pricing schedule
OPEN PDF →
PDF
Gas Ethanol Blend War Pricing — Super
Super grade pricing schedule
OPEN PDF →
Jon Wierda
Fri, Apr 3 · 9:48 AM
additive whitepaper
📎 PDF
📎 Cetane/Diesel Additive Industry Overview — 2024
EMAIL
From: Jon Wierda <jon@wowzafuel.com>  ·  To: Tiffanie

Tiffanie, I wrote this in 2024 and now is a good time to reissue it. It is cetane/diesel additive centric but it gives you a feel for the industry.

Have a great Easter!

PDF
Additive Whitepaper
Cetane/diesel additive industry overview · Jon Wierda, 2024
OPEN PDF →
Jon · Tiffanie
Wed, Apr 1 · 9:39 AM
provisional PO to be agreed upon for testing
3
📎 PDF Sorry, I was traveling by car on a long road trip...
📎 Provisional PO · CF testing · Jeff nudge needed
THREAD
J
Jon Wierda Wed, Apr 1 · 9:39 AM
Sorry, I was traveling by car on a long road trip...
From: Jon Wierda <jon@wowzafuel.com>  ·  To: Tiffanie

Sorry, I was traveling by car on a long road trip...

It seems like things have moved forward, I pushed CF leadership on Monday to move this along.

Please let me know if I need to do anything else. Thank you

T
Tiffanie Rothwell Mon, Mar 30 · 2:29 PM
Hi Jon, Thanks for the context on the pricing approach — I appreciate you laying that out clearly…
From: Tiffanie Rothwell <tiffanie@mjmventures.ai>  ·  To: Mike, Jon

Hi Jon,

Thanks for the context on the pricing approach - I appreciate you laying that out clearly. We want to make sure the numbers make sense for everyone and that we're all working from the same current picture.

Mike is in Bali right now in an intensive workshop, so his availability is limited all week/weekend. He'd love to set up a Zoom between the two of you when he's back, to align on next steps. We're hoping that doesn't hold up the testing side of things - I've been managing this as my next project milestone and really don't want it to become a bottleneck. We've been pushing to get to this step for quite a couple of months now, and I know we're all ready to see this next step completed.

Which brings me to Jeff - he still hasn't submitted the required document. Tomorrow marks a week since I sent it over. I'm a little concerned that if it goes much longer, storage fees could come into play, and that's an added cost none of us need. Any chance you can help nudge him along?

Thanks so much Jon - really appreciate you and everything you're doing on this.

Tiffanie

J
Jon Wierda Wed, Mar 25 · 12:03 PM
Tiffanie, as discussed a provisional PO is needed to have CF move forward with the required sample testing…
From: Jon Wierda <jon@wowzafuel.com>  ·  To: Tiffanie

Tiffanie, as discussed a provisional PO is needed to have CF move forward with the required sample testing. I have attached a sales order here. Please have this approved, call with any questions.

Thank you in advance.

PDF
FPE Provisional PO — March 2026
Purchase order · Sales order for CF sample testing
OPEN PDF →
Jon Wierda · Google Sheets
Fri, Jan 16 · 1:49 PM
Gas Ethanol Blend V2
⚑ PRICING REFERENCE
📊 Google Sheet · Jan 2026 · Original baseline
📊 Original pricing baseline · Jan 16 · Shared with Mike
EMAIL
From: Jon Wierda (via Google Sheets) <drive-shares-dm-noreply@google.com>  ·  To: Tiffanie, mikedavidamg
Jon Wierda shared a spreadsheet

Jon Wierda (jonw@wowzafuel.com) has invited you to comment on the following spreadsheet:

Hello, please confirm access to this. We can discuss prior to your meeting with Alex as needed. I sent the pdf which captures this prior to any changes subsequent. Thank you, time to get in the market....Jon

📊
Gas Ethanol Blend V2
docs.google.com · Click to open spreadsheet
OPEN →
⚑ Mike — this is the original January 16 pricing baseline Jon referenced throughout negotiations. The 27% additive price increase announced in April is measured from this sheet.
Project Documents
Legal
Joint Venture
Agreement
Alex Beaupre · Mike David
Draft Pending
Purchase Order
Provisional
PO
FPE × Little Tree · Mar 2026
Open PDF →
Pricing · Current
Apr 2026
Pricing
3 files · Jon Wierda
↗ Assumptions ↗ Regular ↗ Super
⚑ Pricing Baseline
Gas Ethanol
Blend V2
January 2026 · Original baseline
Open Sheet →
Fuel Blend Economics Calculator
Jon Wierda's Pricing Model — Live Recalculation
Exchange & Conversion
CAD to USD Rate
USD to CAD Rate
Auto-calculated
Litres per Gallon
Commodity Prices
Regular Unleaded R87E10
CAD / Litre
Super Unleaded R87E10
CAD / Litre
Ethanol Spot Price
USD / Gallon
Ethanol Retail Price
USD / Gallon (used in calculations)
Additive Costs (USD / Gallon)
Additive Regular
Additive Super
DCA Regular / Super
Blend Ratios (%)
Regular — Gas %
Regular — Ethanol %
Super — Gas %
Super — Ethanol %
Key Conversion Values
Derived Prices
Regular Unleaded (R87E10)
CAD/L USD/L USD/Gal
Super Unleaded (derived)
CAD/L USD/L USD/Gal
Ethanol Retail
CAD/L CAD/Gal USD/Gal
Blended Cost Tables
Regular Blend 92.5% Gas / 7.5% Eth
ComponentPriceMix %Cost
R87E10
Ethanol
Additiveflat
DCAflat (−)
Blended Cost
Conventional R87 Cost
Margin Improvement
Super Blend 75% Gas / 25% Eth
ComponentPriceMix %Cost
R87E10
Ethanol
Additiveflat
DCAflat (−)
Blended Cost
Conventional Super Cost
Margin Improvement
Tote Economics
Tote Parameters
Delivered Price$18,250 USD
Tote Size (gallons)
Regular additive (88%)
→ Treat ratio 1280:1
Super additive (12%)
→ Treat ratio 640:1
Margin Generated per Tote
Regular margin
Super margin
Total margin / tote
Tote cost− $18,250.00 USD
Net after tote cost
Volume Calculator — Your Monthly Fuel
Regular gallons / month
Super gallons / month
Monthly Margin Improvement
Annual Margin Improvement
Totes Required / Year
Fireflies Meeting Recordings
🔥
Call with Jeff Porter | Little Tree Fuel
ASTM testing, Intertek lab selection, fuel sample logistics
Mar 19, 2026
VIEW →
🔥
Little Tree Fuel | Alex Beaupre & Mike David
Ethanol blends, carbon credits, JV legal structure
Mar 3, 2026
VIEW →
🔥
Jon Wierda, Jeff Porter, Alex & Mike | Little Tree
Dynamo validation, fuel sample testing plan, warranty details
Jan 29, 2026
VIEW →
🔥
ClearBlue Markets & Mike David | Little Tree
Canada Clean Fuel Regulation, carbon credit strategy
Jan 23, 2026
VIEW →
🔥
Jon, John Lawrence, Jeff Porter, Michael K & Mike
1280:1 additive ratio economics, pricing model spreadsheet
Jan 8, 2026
VIEW →
🔥
Jon Wierda, Jeff Porter & Mike David | Little Tree
35% ethanol regulatory compliance, provisional PO
Nov 17, 2025
VIEW →
🔥
Jon Wierda, Jeff Porter & Mike David | Little Tree
93 octane achieved, Falcon branding, 20,000L pilot
Oct 13, 2025
VIEW →
🔥
Jon, Jeff Porter, Alex Beaupre & Mike | Little Tree
Spooky's GEM blend, methanol limits, Indigenous regulatory paths
Jun 12, 2025
VIEW →
Pipeline · CRM

Opportunity Map

41 verified on-reserve fuel stations across Ontario & Quebec — all prospecting stages tracked below

Not Met
41
stations to contact
In Talks
0
active conversations
Met
0
qualified leads
Signed · Revenue
$0 CAD
0 stations closed est. ~$85K CAD/yr each
$0 CAD $3.5M CAD target (41 stations)
Stage Legend: Not Met In Talks Met Signed Hover pins for station details